Lutz Bornmann
Orcid: 0000-0003-0810-7091
According to our database1,
Lutz Bornmann
authored at least 372 papers
between 2004 and 2024.
Collaborative distances:
Collaborative distances:
Timeline
Legend:
Book In proceedings Article PhD thesis Dataset OtherLinks
Online presence:
On csauthors.net:
Bibliography
2024
Scientometrics, September, 2024
Using Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS) to analyze the research and publication culture in immunology.
Scientometrics, June, 2024
Scientometrics, June, 2024
Skewed distributions of scientists' productivity: a research program for the empirical analysis.
Scientometrics, April, 2024
What do we know about the disruption index in scientometrics? An overview of the literature.
Scientometrics, January, 2024
Corrigendum to "Do we measure novelty when we analyze unusual combinations of cited references? A validation study of bibliometric novelty indicators based on F1000Prime data" [Journal of Informetrics 13/4 (2019) 100979].
J. Informetrics, 2024
The Prize Winner Index (PWI): A proposal for an indicator based on scientific prizes.
J. Informetrics, 2024
Recent temporal dynamics in economics: empirical analyses of annual publications in economic fields.
J. Documentation, 2024
The disruption index in the multiverse: The calculation of scores comes with numerous (hidden) degrees of freedom.
CoRR, 2024
Metrics sonification: The introduction of new ways to present bibliometric data using publication data of Loet Leydesdorff as an example.
CoRR, 2024
Usage of OpenAlex for creating meaningful global overlay maps of science on the individual and institutional levels.
CoRR, 2024
2023
Scientometrics, October, 2023
Identification of potential young talented individuals in the natural and life sciences: A bibliometric approach.
J. Informetrics, August, 2023
John Mearsheimer's academic roots: a reference publication year spectroscopy of a political scientist's oeuvre.
Scientometrics, July, 2023
J. Informetrics, May, 2023
Efficiency of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide: The introduction of a new input indicator reflecting institutional staff numbers.
J. Informetrics, May, 2023
Measuring university size: A comparison of academic personnel versus scientific talent pool data.
Quant. Sci. Stud., 2023
What do we know about the disruption indicator in scientometrics? An overview of the literature.
CoRR, 2023
How to measure research performance of single scientists? A proposal for an index based on scientific prizes: The Prize Winner Index (PWI).
CoRR, 2023
2022
Scientometrics, 2022
Relevance of document types in the scores' calculation of a specific field-normalized indicator: Are the scores strongly dependent on or nearly independent of the document type handling?
Scientometrics, 2022
Use of bibliometrics for research evaluation in emerging markets economies: a review and discussion of bibliometric indicators.
Scientometrics, 2022
Scores of a specific field-normalized indicator calculated with different approaches of field-categorization: Are the scores different or similar?
J. Informetrics, 2022
Corrigendum to "Can the journal impact factor be used as a criterion for the selection of junior researchers? A large-scale empirical study based on ResearcherID data" Journal of Informetrics Volume 11, Issue 3, August 2017, Pages 788-799.
J. Informetrics, 2022
Empirical analysis of recent temporal dynamics of research fields: Annual publications in chemistry and related areas as an example.
J. Informetrics, 2022
Simulation of the h index use at university departments within the bibliometrics-based heuristics framework: Can the indicator be used to compare individual researchers?
J. Informetrics, 2022
Identification of young talented individuals in the natural and life sciences using bibliometric data.
CoRR, 2022
Revolutions in science: The proposal of an approach for the identification of most important researchers, institutions, and countries based on Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS).
CoRR, 2022
2021
A call for governments to pause Twitter censorship: using Twitter data as social-spatial sensors of COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 research diffusion.
Scientometrics, 2021
Scientometrics, 2021
A decade of in-text citation analysis based on natural language processing and machine learning techniques: an overview of empirical studies.
Scientometrics, 2021
Can tweets be used to detect problems early with scientific papers? A case study of three retracted COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 papers.
Scientometrics, 2021
Mapping the impact of papers on various status groups in excellencemapping.net: a new release of the excellence mapping tool based on citation and reader scores.
Scientometrics, 2021
Investigating dissemination of scientific information on Twitter: A study of topic networks in opioid publications.
Quant. Sci. Stud., 2021
Which aspects of the Open Science agenda are most relevant to scientometric research and publishing? An opinion paper.
Quant. Sci. Stud., 2021
Applied usage and performance of statistical matching in bibliometrics: The comparison of milestone and regular papers with multiple measurements of disruptiveness as an empirical example.
Quant. Sci. Stud., 2021
Disruption indices and their calculation using web-of-science data: Indicators of historical developments or evolutionary dynamics?
J. Informetrics, 2021
J. Informetrics, 2021
Convergent validity of several indicators measuring disruptiveness with milestone assignments to physics papers by experts.
J. Informetrics, 2021
Which are the influential publications in the Web of Science subject categories over a long period of time? CRExplorer software used for big-data analyses in bibliometrics .
J. Inf. Sci., 2021
Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS) in practice: Three RPYS analyzes in the course of Workshop III "Cited References Analysis Using CRExplorer" at the 18th ISSI conference.
CoRR, 2021
Report on Workshop III "Cited References Analysis Using CRExplorer" at the 18th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI2021).
CoRR, 2021
CoRR, 2021
Mapping the impact of papers on various status groups: A new excellence mapping tool based on citation and reader scores.
CoRR, 2021
Investigating Diffusion of Scientific Knowledge on Twitter: A Study of Topic Networks of Opioid Publications.
CoRR, 2021
2020
Scientometrics, 2020
Correction to: Citation concept analysis (CCA): a new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper.
Scientometrics, 2020
Citation concept analysis (CCA): a new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper.
Scientometrics, 2020
An evaluation of percentile measures of citation impact, and a proposal for making them better.
Scientometrics, 2020
Historical roots of Judit Bar-Ilan's research: a cited-references analysis using CRExplorer.
Scientometrics, 2020
Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics: meaningful results by using an improved variant of the disruption index originally proposed by Wu, Wang, and Evans (2019).
Scientometrics, 2020
Bibliometrics-based decision tree (BBDT) for deciding whether two universities in the Leiden ranking differ substantially in their performance.
Scientometrics, 2020
Author name disambiguation of bibliometric data: A comparison of several unsupervised approaches.
Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020
Can altmetrics reflect societal impact considerations?: Exploring the potential of altmetrics in the context of a sustainability science research center.
Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020
Citation concept analysis (CCA) of Robert K. Merton's book Social Theory and Social Structure: How often are certain concepts from the book cited in subsequent publications?
Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020
Does the <i>h</i><sub>α</sub>-index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? The introduction of agent-based simulations into scientometrics.
Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020
Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers.
Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020
How can citation impact in bibliometrics be normalized? A new approach combining citing-side normalization and citation percentiles.
Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020
Bibliometrics-based decision trees (BBDTs) based on bibliometrics-based heuristics (BBHs): Visualized guidelines for the use of bibliometrics in research evaluation.
Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020
Corrigendum to "Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative networks based on author keywords and hashtags" [J. Informetrics 13 (2019) 695-707].
J. Informetrics, 2020
Should citations be field-normalized in evaluative bibliometrics? An empirical analysis based on propensity score matching.
J. Informetrics, 2020
Research diversification and its relationship with publication counts and impact: A case study based on Australian professors.
J. Inf. Sci., 2020
How to identify the roots of broad research topics and fields? The introduction of RPYS sampling using the example of climate change research.
J. Inf. Sci., 2020
Library and Information Science Papers Discussed on Twitter: A new Network-based Approach for Measuring Public Attention.
J. Data Inf. Sci., 2020
Growth rates of modern science: A latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases.
CoRR, 2020
Are papers addressing certain diseases perceived where these diseases are prevalent? The proposal to use Twitter data as social-spatial sensors.
CoRR, 2020
CoRR, 2020
Reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) of computer science papers from Eastern Europe.
Aslib J. Inf. Manag., 2020
2019
What do citation counts measure? An updated review of studies on citations in scientific documents published between 2006 and 2018.
Scientometrics, 2019
The integrated impact indicator revisited (I3*): a non-parametric alternative to the journal impact factor.
Scientometrics, 2019
R package for producing beamplots as a preferred alternative to the h index when assessing single researchers (based on downloads from Web of Science).
Scientometrics, 2019
How well does I3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators? The convergent validity of several (field-normalized) indicators.
Scientometrics, 2019
Heuristics as conceptual lens for understanding and studying the usage of bibliometrics in research evaluation.
Scientometrics, 2019
J. Informetrics, 2019
Interdisciplinarity as diversity in citation patterns among journals: Rao-Stirling diversity, relative variety, and the Gini coefficient.
J. Informetrics, 2019
Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative networks based on author keywords and hashtags.
J. Informetrics, 2019
Do we measure novelty when we analyze unusual combinations of cited references? A validation study of bibliometric novelty indicators based on F1000Prime data.
J. Informetrics, 2019
MHq indicators for zero-inflated count data - A response to the comment by Smolinsky (in press).
J. Informetrics, 2019
Do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies? An empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK research excellence framework (REF).
J. Informetrics, 2019
Does the normalized citation impact of universities profit from certain properties of their published documents - such as the number of authors and the impact factor of the publishing journals? A multilevel modeling approach.
J. Informetrics, 2019
Hot and cold spots in the US research: A spatial analysis of bibliometric data on the institutional level.
J. Inf. Sci., 2019
The Relative Influences of Government Funding and International Collaboration on Citation Impact.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2019
Statistical significance and effect sizes of differences among research universities at the level of nations and worldwide based on the leiden rankings.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2019
Do disruption index indicators measure what they propose to measure? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers.
CoRR, 2019
Citation concept analysis (CCA) - A new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by two exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper.
CoRR, 2019
Does the h<sub>α</sub> index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R.
CoRR, 2019
The Integrated Impact Indicator (I3) and the Journal Impact Factor: A Non‑Parametric Alternative.
Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, 2019
The convergent validity of several (field-normalized) bibliometric indicators: How well does I3 perform for impact measurement?
Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, 2019
Proceedings of the Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators., 2019
2018
Identifying single influential publications in a research field: new analysis opportunities of the CRExplorer.
Scientometrics, 2018
Discontinuities in citation relations among journals: self-organized criticality as a model of scientific revolutions and change.
Scientometrics, 2018
Betweenness and diversity in journal citation networks as measures of interdisciplinarity - A tribute to Eugene Garfield.
Scientometrics, 2018
The number of linked references of publications in Microsoft Academic in comparison with the Web of Science.
Scientometrics, 2018
Field- and time-normalization of data with many zeros: an empirical analysis using citation and Twitter data.
Scientometrics, 2018
Identifying "hot papers" and papers with "delayed recognition" in large-scale datasets by using dynamically normalized citation impact scores.
Scientometrics, 2018
Count highly-cited papers instead of papers with h citations: use normalized citation counts and compare "like with like"!
Scientometrics, 2018
Scientometrics, 2018
Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis.
Scientometrics, 2018
Scientometrics, 2018
Plots for visualizing paper impact and journal impact of single researchers in a single graph.
Scientometrics, 2018
Which differences can be expected when two universities in the Leiden Ranking are compared? Some benchmarks for institutional research evaluations.
Scientometrics, 2018
Field classification of publications in Dimensions: a first case study testing its reliability and validity.
Scientometrics, 2018
Which research institution performs better than average in a subject category or better than selected other institutions?
Online Inf. Rev., 2018
Creativity in science and the link to cited references: Is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references?
J. Informetrics, 2018
Core elements in the process of citing publications: Conceptual overview of the literature.
J. Informetrics, 2018
Algorithmically generated subject categories based on citation relations: An empirical micro study using papers on overall water splitting.
J. Informetrics, 2018
Critical rationalism and the search for standard (field-normalized) indicators in bibliometrics.
J. Informetrics, 2018
MHq indicators for zero-inflated count data - A response to Smolinsky and Marx (2018).
J. Informetrics, 2018
Normalization of zero-inflated data: An empirical analysis of a new indicator family and its use with altmetrics data.
J. Informetrics, 2018
The negative effects of citing with a national orientation in terms of recognition: National and international citations in natural-sciences papers from Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK.
J. Informetrics, 2018
Identifying landmark publications in the long run using field-normalized citation data.
J. Documentation, 2018
"Smart girls" versus "sleeping beauties" in the sciences: The identification of instant and delayed recognition by using the citation angle.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2018
Bibliometrics-based heuristics: What is their definition and how can they be studied?
CoRR, 2018
Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of networks based on author keywords and hashtags.
CoRR, 2018
Do altmetrics assess societal impact in the same way as case studies? An empirical analysis testing the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK Research Excellence Framework (REF).
CoRR, 2018
The concordance of field-normalized scores based on Web of Science and Microsoft Academic data: A case study in computer sciences.
CoRR, 2018
The negative effects of citing with a national orientation in terms of recognition: national and international citations in papers from Germany, the Netherlands, and UK.
CoRR, 2018
2017
Which early works are cited most frequently in climate change research literature? A bibliometric approach based on Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy.
Scientometrics, 2017
Slow reception and under-citedness in climate change research: A case study of Charles David Keeling, discoverer of the risk of global warming.
Scientometrics, 2017
Generating clustered journal maps: an automated system for hierarchical classification.
Scientometrics, 2017
How many scientific papers are mentioned in policy-related documents? An empirical investigation using Web of Science and Altmetric data.
Scientometrics, 2017
Sequence analysis of annually normalized citation counts: an empirical analysis based on the characteristic scores and scales (CSS) method.
Scientometrics, 2017
Calculating the excellence shift: How efficiently do institutions produce highly cited papers?
Scientometrics, 2017
Scientometrics, 2017
Does evaluative scientometrics lose its main focus on scientific quality by the new orientation towards societal impact?
Scientometrics, 2017
Scientometrics, 2017
Are there any frontiers of research performance? Efficiency measurement of funded research projects with the Bayesian stochastic frontier analysis for count data.
J. Informetrics, 2017
Use of the journal impact factor as a criterion for the selection of junior researchers: A rejoinder on a comment by Peters (2017).
J. Informetrics, 2017
Can the journal impact factor be used as a criterion for the selection of junior researchers? A large-scale empirical study based on ResearcherID data.
J. Informetrics, 2017
Skewness of citation impact data and covariates of citation distributions: A large-scale empirical analysis based on Web of Science data.
J. Informetrics, 2017
The Power-weakness Ratios (PWR) as a Journal Indicator: Testing the "Tournaments" Metaphor in Citation Impact Studies.
J. Data Inf. Sci., 2017
Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): An empirical attempt to study a new field-normalized bibliometric indicator.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017
Is collaboration among scientists related to the citation impact of papers because their quality increases with collaboration? An analysis based on data from F1000Prime and normalized citation scores.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017
Field- and time-normalization of zero-inflated data: An empirical analysis using citation and Twitter data.
CoRR, 2017
Do bibliometrics and altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime, altmetrics, and citation data.
CoRR, 2017
The geography of references in elite articles: What countries contribute to the archives of knowledge.
CoRR, 2017
Algorithmically generated subject categories based on citation relations: An empirical micro study using papers on overall water splitting and related topics.
CoRR, 2017
Model for Explaining Citations in Scholarly Publications: A Conceptual Overview of the Literature.
CoRR, 2017
Normalization of zero-inflated data: An empirical analysis of a new indicator family.
Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, 2017
2016
At what institutions did Nobel laureates do their prize-winning work? An analysis of biographical information on Nobel laureates from 1994 to 2014.
Scientometrics, 2016
Change of perspective: bibliometrics from the point of view of cited references - a literature overview on approaches to the evaluation of cited references in bibliometrics.
Scientometrics, 2016
Professional and citizen bibliometrics: complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators - a state-of-the-art report.
Scientometrics, 2016
Cited references and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) as two different knowledge representations: clustering and mappings at the paper level.
Scientometrics, 2016
Scientometrics, 2016
Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: how often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents?
Scientometrics, 2016
How to normalize Twitter counts? A first attempt based on journals in the Twitter Index.
Scientometrics, 2016
Is the promotion of research reflected in bibliometric data? A network analysis of highly cited papers on the Clusters of Excellence supported under the Excellence Initiative in Germany.
Scientometrics, 2016
To what extent does the Leiden manifesto also apply to altmetrics? A discussion of the manifesto against the background of research into altmetrics.
Online Inf. Rev., 2016
J. Informetrics, 2016
Introducing CitedReferencesExplorer (CRExplorer): A program for reference publication year spectroscopy with cited references standardization.
J. Informetrics, 2016
Construction of a pragmatic base line for journal classifications and maps based on aggregated journal-journal citation relations.
J. Informetrics, 2016
J. Informetrics, 2016
Excellence networks in science: A Web-based application based on Bayesian multilevel logistic regression (BMLR) for the identification of institutions collaborating successfully.
J. Informetrics, 2016
Citation score normalized by cited references (CSNCR): The introduction of a new citation impact indicator.
J. Informetrics, 2016
Normalization of Mendeley reader impact on the reader- and paper-side: A comparison of the mean discipline normalized reader score (MDNRS) with the mean normalized reader score (MNRS) and bare reader counts.
J. Informetrics, 2016
The operationalization of "fields" as WoS subject categories (WCs) in evaluative bibliometrics: The cases of "library and information science" and "science & technology studies".
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016
A new approach to the QS university ranking using the composite I-distance indicator: Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016
The application of bibliometrics to research evaluation in the humanities and social sciences: An exploratory study using normalized Google Scholar data for the publications of a research institute.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016
How much does the expected number of citations for a publication change if it contains the address of a specific scientific institute? A new approach for the analysis of citation data on the institutional level based on regression models.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016
Highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (LIS): Authors, institutions, and network structures.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016
Frontiers Res. Metrics Anal., 2016
Introducing CitedReferencesExplorer (CRExplorer): A program for Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy with Cited References Disambiguation.
CoRR, 2016
Professional and Citizen Bibliometrics: Complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators.
CoRR, 2016
A Reproducible Journal Classification and Global Map of Science Based on Aggregated Journal-Journal Citation Relations.
CoRR, 2016
Referenced Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS) and Algorithmic Historiography: The Bibliometric Reconstruction of András Schubert's Œuvre.
CoRR, 2016
Measuring field-normalized impact of papers on specific societal groups: An altmetrics study based on Mendeley data.
CoRR, 2016
2015
Scientometrics, 2015
Philosophy of science viewed through the lense of "Referenced Publication Years Spectroscopy" (RPYS).
Scientometrics, 2015
Scientometrics, 2015
How have the Eastern European countries of the former Warsaw Pact developed since 1990? A bibliometric study.
Scientometrics, 2015
Topical connections between the institutions within an organisation (institutional co-authorships, direct citation links and co-citations).
Scientometrics, 2015
The interest of the scientific community in expert opinions from journal peer review procedures.
Scientometrics, 2015
Evaluation of the highly-cited researchers' database for a country: proposals for meaningful analyses on the example of Germany.
Scientometrics, 2015
Letter to the Editor: On the conceptualisation and theorisation of the impact caused by publications.
Scientometrics, 2015
Alternative metrics in scientometrics: a meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics.
Scientometrics, 2015
PeerJ Comput. Sci., 2015
Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics: Which method best reflects the judgements of experts?
J. Informetrics, 2015
Does quality and content matter for citedness? A comparison with para-textual factors and over time.
J. Informetrics, 2015
Which people use which scientific papers? An evaluation of data from F1000 and Mendeley.
J. Informetrics, 2015
Testing for the fairness and predictive validity of research funding decisions: A multilevel multiple imputation for missing data approach using ex-ante and ex-post peer evaluation data from the Austrian science fund.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015
BRICS countries and scientific excellence: A bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015
How well does a university perform in comparison with its peers? The use of odds, and odds ratios, for the comparison of institutional citation impact using the Leiden Rankings.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015
Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015
Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly cited researchers? An analysis of the data from highlycited.com.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015
Complex tasks and simple solutions: The use of heuristics in the evaluation of research.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015
Excellence networks in science: A web-based application (www.excellence-networks.net) for the identification of institutions collaborating successfully.
CoRR, 2015
Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: How is climate change research perceived in policy documents?
CoRR, 2015
Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A first empirical attempt to study a new field-normalized bibliometric indicator.
CoRR, 2015
Usefulness of altmetrics for measuring the broader impact of research: A case study using data from PLOS and F1000Prime.
Aslib J. Inf. Manag., 2015
Who Publishes, Reads, and Cites Papers? An Analysis of Country Information.
Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Istanbul, Turkey, June 29, 2015
2014
Tracing the origin of a scientific legend by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS): the legend of the Darwin finches.
Scientometrics, 2014
How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations.
Scientometrics, 2014
How should the societal impact of research be generated and measured? A proposal for a simple and practicable approach to allow interdisciplinary comparisons.
Scientometrics, 2014
Ranking and mapping of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide based on highly-cited papers: A visualisation of results from multi-level models.
Online Inf. Rev., 2014
The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: Competition and collaborations.
J. Informetrics, 2014
Referenced Publication Years Spectroscopy applied to iMetrics: Scientometrics, Journal of Informetrics, and a relevant subset of JASIST.
J. Informetrics, 2014
What is the effect of country-specific characteristics on the research performance of scientific institutions? Using multi-level statistical models to rank and map universities and research-focused institutions worldwide.
J. Informetrics, 2014
How to improve the prediction based on citation impact percentiles for years shortly after the publication date?
J. Informetrics, 2014
J. Informetrics, 2014
Validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact: A study using data from Altmetric and F1000Prime.
J. Informetrics, 2014
Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics.
J. Informetrics, 2014
Assigning publications to multiple subject categories for bibliometric analysis: An empirical case study based on percentiles.
J. Documentation, 2014
Detecting the historical roots of research fields by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS).
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014
Distributions instead of single numbers: Percentiles and beam plots for the assessment of single researchers.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014
What proportion of excellent papers makes an institution one of the best worldwide? Specifying thresholds for the interpretation of the results of the SCImago Institutions Ranking and the Leiden Ranking.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014
Philosophy of science viewed through the lense of "References Publication Years spectrosopy" (RPYS).
CoRR, 2014
The substantive and practical significance of citation impact differences between institutions: Guidelines for the analysis of percentiles using effect sizes and confidence intervals.
CoRR, 2014
The "Tournaments" Metaphor in Citation Impact Studies: Power-Weakness Ratios (PWR) as a Journal Indicator.
CoRR, 2014
A macro level scientometric analysis of world tribology research output (1998 - 2012).
CoRR, 2014
Which kind of papers has higher or lower altmetric counts? A study using article-level metrics from PLOS and F1000Prime.
CoRR, 2014
CoRR, 2014
How are excellent (highly cited) papers defined in bibliometrics? A quantitative analysis of the literature.
CoRR, 2014
On the origins and the historical roots of the Higgs boson research from a bibliometric perspective.
CoRR, 2014
2013
The emergence of plate tectonics and the Kuhnian model of paradigm shift: a bibliometric case study based on the Anna Karenina principle.
Scientometrics, 2013
The research guarantors of scientific papers and the output counting: a promising new approach.
Scientometrics, 2013
How to calculate the practical significance of citation impact differences? An empirical example from evaluative institutional bibliometrics using adjusted predictions and marginal effects.
J. Informetrics, 2013
The proposal of a broadening of perspective in evaluative bibliometrics by complementing the times cited with a cited reference analysis.
J. Informetrics, 2013
J. Informetrics, 2013
Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100).
J. Informetrics, 2013
The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits.
J. Informetrics, 2013
The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000.
J. Informetrics, 2013
The problem of citation impact assessments for recent publication years in institutional evaluations.
J. Informetrics, 2013
How can journal impact factors be normalized across fields of science? An assessment in terms of percentile ranks and fractional counts.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013
Field-normalized impact factors (IFs): A comparison of rescaling and fractionally counted IFs.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013
Multilevel-statistical reformulation of citation-based university rankings: The Leiden ranking 2011/2012.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013
Do Universities or Research Institutions With a Specific Subject Profile Have an Advantage or a Disadvantage in Institutional Rankings? A Latent Class Analysis With Data From the SCImago Ranking.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013
How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics: The statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013
Standards for the application of bibliometrics in the evaluation of individual researchers working in the natural sciences
CoRR, 2013
The historical roots of iMetrics: Referenced Publication Years Spectroscopy (RPYS) routinized and applied to Scientometrics, Journal of Informetrics, and (a subset of) JASIST.
CoRR, 2013
CoRR, 2013
Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed one (P100).
CoRR, 2013
2012
Metrics to evaluate research performance in academic institutions: a critique of ERA 2010 as applied in forestry and the indirect H2 index as a possible alternative.
Scientometrics, 2012
Closed versus open reviewing of journal manuscripts: how far do comments differ in language use?
Scientometrics, 2012
The effect of several versions of one and the same manuscript published by a journal on its journal impact factor.
Scientometrics, 2012
In public peer review of submitted manuscripts, how do reviewer comments differ from comments written by interested members of the scientific community? A content analysis of comments written for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
Scientometrics, 2012
What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality?
J. Informetrics, 2012
Stata commands for importing bibliometric data and processing author address information.
J. Informetrics, 2012
J. Informetrics, 2012
Which are the best performing regions in information science in terms of highly cited papers? Some improvements of our previous mapping approaches.
J. Informetrics, 2012
The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011.
J. Informetrics, 2012
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2012
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2012
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2012
Ranking and mapping of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide based on highly-cited papers: A visualization of results from multi-level models
CoRR, 2012
Field-normalized Impact Factors: A Comparison of Rescaling versus Fractionally Counted IFs
CoRR, 2012
How to analyse percentile impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics: The statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes and top-cited papers.
CoRR, 2012
Citation impact of papers published from six prolific countries: A national comparison based on InCites data
CoRR, 2012
2011
Does the h index for assessing single publications really work? A case study on papers published in chemistry.
Scientometrics, 2011
The effect of a two-stage publication process on the Journal Impact Factor: a case study on the interactive open access journal <i>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</i>.
Scientometrics, 2011
The calculation of the single publication h index and related performances measures: A Web application based on Google Scholar data.
Online Inf. Rev., 2011
Learn. Publ., 2011
The detection of "hot regions" in the geography of science - A visualization approach by using density maps.
J. Informetrics, 2011
Is it necessary to consider suburbs (or small cities in the close proximity) and name variants in a citation impact analysis for bigger cities? An investigation using Munich as an example.
J. Informetrics, 2011
A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants.
J. Informetrics, 2011
Further steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance: The avoidance of citation (ratio) averages in field-normalization.
J. Informetrics, 2011
J. Informetrics, 2011
Some interesting insights from aggregated data published in the World Report SIR 2010.
J. Informetrics, 2011
Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011
Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011
How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor: Normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011
Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? A study on the predictive validity of <i>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</i> by using percentile rank classes.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011
Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? A new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011
Which cities' paper output and citation impact are above expectation in information science? Some improvements of our previous mapping approaches.
CoRR, 2011
CoRR, 2011
Integrated Impact Indicators (I3) compared with Impact Factors (IFs): An alternative research design with policy implications
CoRR, 2011
Which cities produce excellent papers worldwide more than can be expected? A new mapping approach--using Google Maps--based on statistical significance testing
CoRR, 2011
Normalizing the measurement of citation performance: Principles for comparing sets of documents
CoRR, 2011
2010
How accurately does Thomas Kuhn's model of paradigm change describe the transition from the static view of the universe to the big bang theory in cosmology? - A historical reconstruction and citation analysis.
Scientometrics, 2010
A content analysis of referees' comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ?
Scientometrics, 2010
The validity of staff editors' initial evaluations of manuscripts: a case study of <i>Angewandte Chemie International Edition</i>.
Scientometrics, 2010
Learn. Publ., 2010
J. Informetrics, 2010
A meta-evaluation of scientific research proposals: Different ways of comparing rejected to awarded applications.
J. Informetrics, 2010
J. Informetrics, 2010
Citation speed as a measure to predict the attention an article receives: An investigation of the validity of editorial decisions at Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
J. Informetrics, 2010
Towards an ideal method of measuring research performance: Some comments to the Opthof and Leydesdorff (2010) paper.
J. Informetrics, 2010
Reference standards and reference multipliers for the comparison of the citation impact of papers published in different time periods.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2010
How fractional counting affects the Impact Factor: Steps towards field-independent classifications of scholarly journals and literature
CoRR, 2010
Predictive validity of editorial decisions at an open access journal: A case study on Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
Proceedings of the Publishing in the networked world: Transforming the Nature of Communication, 2010
2009
The influence of the applicants' gender on the modeling of a peer review process by using latent Markov models.
Scientometrics, 2009
Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry - Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts.
J. Informetrics, 2009
Extent of type I and type II errors in editorial decisions: A case study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
J. Informetrics, 2009
Do we need the <i>h</i> index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures?
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2009
Universality of citation distributions-A validation of Radicchi et al.'s relative indicator <i>c</i><sub><i>f</i></sub> = <i>c</i>/<i>c</i><sub>0</sub> at the micro level using data from chemistry.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2009
2008
Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication.
Scientometrics, 2008
How to detect indications of potential sources of bias in peer review: A generalized latent variable modeling approach exemplified by a gender study.
J. Informetrics, 2008
J. Documentation, 2008
Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the <i>h</i> index? A comparison of nine different variants of the <i>h</i> index using data from biomedicine.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2008
Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by <i>Angewandte Chemie International Edition</i>, or rejected but published elsewhere.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2008
2007
Convergent validation of peer review decisions using the h index: Extent of and reasons for type I and type II errors.
J. Informetrics, 2007
Gatekeepers of science - Effects of external reviewers' attributes on the assessments of fellowship applications.
J. Informetrics, 2007
Multiple publication on a single research study: Does it pay? The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2007
2006
Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants.
Scientometrics, 2006
2005
Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions.
Scientometrics, 2005
2004