Kayvan Kousha

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., March, 2024

Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Learn. Publ., January, 2024

Journal Quality Factors from ChatGPT: More meaningful than Impact Factors?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2024

Assessing the societal influence of academic research with ChatGPT: Impact case study evaluations.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2024

2023

In which fields are citations indicators of research quality?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., August, 2023

In which fields do higher impact journals publish higher quality articles?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, July, 2023

Why are coauthored academic articles more cited: Higher quality or larger audience?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., July, 2023

Do altmetric scores reflect article quality? Evidence from the UK Research Excellence Framework 2021.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., May, 2023

Is big team research fair in national research assessments? The case of the UK Research Excellence Framework 2021.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Data Inf. Sci., February, 2023

Predicting article quality scores with machine learning: The U.K. Research Excellence Framework.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2023

Is research funding always beneficial? A cross-disciplinary analysis of U.K. research 2014-20.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Cristina I. Font Julián

Paul Wilson

Jonathan M. Levitt

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2023

Data sharing and reuse practices: disciplinary differences and improvements needed.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Online Inf. Rev., 2023

Does the perceived quality of interdisciplinary research vary between fields?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Documentation, 2023

Terms in journal articles associating with high quality: can qualitative research be world-leading?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Documentation, 2023

2022

The high scholarly value of grey literature before and during Covid-19.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Matthew Bickley

Scientometrics, 2022

A systematic method for identifying references to academic research in grey literature.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Matthew Bickley

Michael Thelwall

Scientometrics, 2022

Covid-19 refereeing duration and impact in major medical journals.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2022

Are data repositories fettered? A survey of current practices, challenges and future technologies.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Online Inf. Rev., 2022

Can REF output quality scores be assigned by AI? Experimental evidence.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2022

Do bibliometrics introduce gender, institutional or interdisciplinary biases into research evaluations?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2022

Artificial intelligence technologies to support research assessment: A review.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2022

Why are co-authored academic articles more cited: Higher quality or larger audience?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2022

Is Research Funding Always Beneficial? A Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of UK Research 2014-20.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Cristina I. Font Julián

Paul Wilson

Jonathan M. Levitt

CoRR, 2022

Are internationally co-authored journal articles better quality? The UK case 2014-2020.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2022

Predicting article quality scores with machine learning: The UK Research Excellence Framework.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

CoRR, 2022

2021

Researchers' attitudes towards the h-index on Twitter 2007-2020: criticism and acceptance.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2021

Measuring the impact of biodiversity datasets: data reuse, citations and altmetrics.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2021

Which types of online evidence show the nonacademic benefits of research? Websites cited in UK impact case studies.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2021

2020

Can the impact of grey literature be assessed? An investigation of UK government publications cited by articles and books.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Matthew Bickley

Michael Thelwall

Scientometrics, 2020

Google Books, Scopus, Microsoft Academic, and Mendeley for impact assessment of doctoral dissertations: A multidisciplinary analysis of the UK.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020

COVID-19 publications: Database coverage, citations, readers, tweets, news, Facebook walls, Reddit posts.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Quant. Sci. Stud., 2020

2019

Web of Science and Scopus language coverage.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Miguel-Angel Vera-Baceta

Michael Thelwall

Scientometrics, 2019

Can Google Scholar and Mendeley help to assess the scholarly impacts of dissertations?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2019

An Automatic Method to Identify Citations to Journals in News Stories: A Case Study of UK Newspapers Citing Web of Science Journals.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Data Inf. Sci., 2019

Data Citation and Reuse Practice in Biodiversity - Challenges of Adopting a Standard Citation Model.

[BibT_eX]

Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, 2019

Web Citation Indicators for Wider Impact Assessment of Articles.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators., 2019

2018

Can Microsoft Academic assess the early citation impact of in-press articles? A multi-discipline exploratory analysis.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2018

Can Microsoft Academic help to assess the citation impact of academic books?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Informetrics, 2018

2017

Is medical research informing professional practice more highly cited? Evidence from AHFS DI Essentials in drugs.com.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2017

ResearchGate versus Google Scholar: Which finds more early citations?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2017

Do Mendeley reader counts reflect the scholarly impact of conference papers? An investigation of computer science and engineering.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Kuku Joseph Aduku

Scientometrics, 2017

SlideShare presentations, citations, users, and trends: A professional site with academic and educational uses.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017

Goodreads: A social network site for book readers.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017

ResearchGate articles: Age, discipline, audience size, and impact.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017

Web citations in patents: Evidence of technological impact?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Enrique Orduña-Malea

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017

Goodreads reviews to assess the wider impacts of books.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017

News stories as evidence for research? BBC citations from articles, Books, and Wikipedia.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017

Are wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017

Patent citation analysis with Google.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2017

Do journal data sharing mandates work? Life sciences evidence from Dryad.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Aslib J. Inf. Manag., 2017

2016

Are citations from clinical trials evidence of higher impact research? An analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2016

Michael Thelwall wins the 2015 Derek John de Solla Price Medal.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Jonathan M. Levitt

Scientometrics, 2016

Figshare: a universal repository for academic resource sharing?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Online Inf. Rev., 2016

Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? A survey of user motivations.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Ehsan Mohammadi

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016

An automatic method for assessing the teaching impact of books from online academic syllabi.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016

Can Amazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016

Academic software downloads from Google Code: useful usage indicators?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Inf. Res., 2016

2015

ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring Scholarship?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015

An automatic method for extracting citations from Google Books.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015

Alternative metric indicators for funding scheme evaluations.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Aslib J. Inf. Manag., 2015

The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Xuemei Li

Aslib J. Inf. Manag., 2015

Alternative Metrics for Book Impact Assessment: Can Choice Reviews be a Useful Source?

[BibT_eX]

Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Istanbul, Turkey, June 29, 2015

2014

Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2014

Successful researchers publicizing research online: An outlink analysis of European highly cited scientists' personal websites.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Documentation, 2014

Academia.edu: Social network or Academic Network?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014

Disseminating research with web CV hyperlinks.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014

2012

The role of online videos in research communication: A content analysis of YouTube videos cited in academic publications.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2012

2011

Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Somayeh Rezaie

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011

2010

The citation impact of Open Access agricultural research: A comparison between OA and non-OA publications.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Online Inf. Rev., 2010

Using the Web for research evaluation: The Integrated Online Impact indicator.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Somayeh Rezaie

J. Informetrics, 2010

Can the impact of scholarly images be assessed online? An exploratory study using image identification technology.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Somayeh Rezaie

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2010

2009

Google book search: Citation analysis for social science and the humanities.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2009

Characteristics of open access scholarly publishing: A multidisciplinary study.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Aslib Proc., 2009

2008

Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2008

Online presentations as a source of scientific impact? An analysis of PowerPoint files citing academic journals.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2008

Assessing the impact of disciplinary research on teaching: An automatic analysis of online syllabuses.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2008

2007

How is science cited on the Web? A classification of google unique Web citations.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2007

Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2007

2006

Motivations for URL citations to open access library and information science articles.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Scientometrics, 2006

1999

DVD: The next evolutionary step for publishing multimedia reference sources.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]