James Hartley

Orcid: 0000-0002-6461-3266

Affiliations:
  • Keele University, UK


According to our database1, James Hartley authored at least 92 papers between 1988 and 2019.

Collaborative distances:
  • Dijkstra number2 of five.
  • Erdős number3 of four.

Timeline

Legend:

Book 
In proceedings 
Article 
PhD thesis 
Dataset
Other 

Links

Online presence:

On csauthors.net:

Bibliography

2019
Some reflections on being cited 10, 000 times.
Scientometrics, 2019

2018
Some observations on the current state of book reviewing in the social sciences.
Learn. Publ., 2018

2017
Highly cited publications in World War II: a bibliometric analysis.
Scientometrics, 2017

Sleeping beauties in psychology.
Scientometrics, 2017

Who woke the sleeping beauties in psychology?
Scientometrics, 2017

The decline and fall of book reviews in psychology: a bibliometric analysis.
Scientometrics, 2017

Authors and their citations: a point of view.
Scientometrics, 2017

Thirteen Ways to Write an Abstract.
Publ., 2017

The delights, discomforts, and downright furies of the manuscript submission process.
Learn. Publ., 2017

What can new technology tell us about the reviewing process for journal submissions in <i>BJET</i>?
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2017

2016
Book reviews in time.
Scientometrics, 2016

Are two authors better than one? Can writing in pairs affect the readability of academic blogs?
Scientometrics, 2016

Erratum to: Is time up for the Flesch measure of reading ease?
Scientometrics, 2016

Is time up for the Flesch measure of reading ease?
Scientometrics, 2016

Is it true that papers written by joint-authors are cited more than papers written by single ones? What else matters?
Scientometrics, 2016

Peer choice - does reviewer self-selection work?
Learn. Publ., 2016

Spamming in scholarly publishing: A case study.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2016

2015
An academic odyssey: writing over time.
Scientometrics, 2015

Inaccuracies in titles.
Scientometrics, 2015

Research on tables and graphs in academic articles: Pitfalls and promises.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015

2014
Do men and women differ in their use of tables and graphs in academic publications?
Scientometrics, 2014

New technology and Christmas greetings.
Scientometrics, 2014

Solo versus collaborative writing: Discrepancies in the use of tables and graphs in academic articles.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2014

2013
New ways of sending Christmas greetings.
Scientometrics, 2013

Graphs and prestige in agricultural journals.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013

Publication fees for open access journals: Different disciplines - different methods.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013

Issues of work-life balance among <i>JASIST</i> authors and editors.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2013

Academic and professional publishing - Edited by Robert Campbell et al.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2013

Learning to write effectively - Edited by Torrance Mark et al.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2013

2012
To cite or not to cite: author self-citations and the impact factor.
Scientometrics, 2012

Key variables come first! How best to design a correlation table when there is one key variable.
J. Inf. Sci., 2012

Presenting numerical values within sentences and text tables.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2012

Visible learning for teachers - By John Hattie.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2012

Refereeing academic articles in the information age.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2012

2011
Write when you can and submit when you are ready!
Learn. Publ., 2011

Writing the conclusions: how do bullet-points help?
J. Inf. Sci., 2011

Social and behavioral research and the internet - Edited by Marcel Das et al.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2011

2010
Never mind the impact factor: colleagues know better!
Learn. Publ., 2010

Teaching the new writing - Edited by Ann Herrington et al.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2010

2009
Letter to the Editor: 'Scientific collaboration and quality of scientific research'.
Webology, 2009

On the need to distinguish between author and journal self-citations.
Scientometrics, 2009

Common weaknesses in traditional abstracts in the social sciences.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2009

E-collaboration - Edited by Ned Kock.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2009

Sage handbook of educational action research - Edited by Susan Noffke & Bridget Somekh.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2009

Applied e-learning and e-teaching in higher education - Edited by Roisin Donnelly & Fiona McSweeney.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2009

2008
Revising and polishing a structured abstract: Is it worth the time and effort?
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2008

Time of day, exam performance and new technology.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2008

Oxford handbook of internet psychology - Edited by Adam Joinson.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2008

Handbook of research on electronic surveys and measurements - Edited by Rodney A Reynolds.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2008

2007
Lost in translation: contributions of editors to the meanings of text.
J. Inf. Sci., 2007

The effects of spacing and titles on judgments of the effectiveness of structured abstracts.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2007

Teaching, learning and new technology: a review for teachers.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2007

2006
Reading and writing book reviews across the disciplines.
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2006

Perfect presentations! - Peter Levin & Graham Topping.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2006

Disabled students in higher education - Sheila, Riddell <i>et al</i>.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2006

Developing... ICT... for early childhood education - Siraj-Blatchford, Iram & Siraj-Blatchford, John.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2006

2005
What's in a title? Numbers of words and the presence of colons.
Scientometrics, 2005

Down with 'op. cit.'.
Learn. Publ., 2005

Refereeing and the single author.
J. Inf. Sci., 2005

Reviews.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2005

Book reviewing in the BJET: a survey of BJET's referees' and writers' views.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2005

Individual preferences in e-learning.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2005

Small group teaching.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2005

IssueWeb.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2005

2004
On requesting conference papers electronically.
J. Inf. Sci., 2004

On Requesting Re-Prints Electronically.
J. Inf. Sci., 2004

TnT: texts and technology.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2004

2003
Abstracts, introductions and discussions: How far do they differ in style?.
Scientometrics, 2003

How Useful are 'Key Words' in Scientific Journals?
J. Inf. Sci., 2003

Speaking versus typing: a case-study of the effects of using voice-recognition software on academic correspondence.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2003

Reviews: 8.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2003

Reviews.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2003

2002
Open letter to technical journal editors regarding structured abstracts: this letter proposes that structured abstracts be required for all technical journal articles.
J. Inf. Sci., 2002

Do structured abstracts take more space? And does it matter?
J. Inf. Sci., 2002

2001
Referees are not always right! The case of the 3-D graph.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2001

<i>Writing through time: longitudinal studies of the effects of new technology on writing</i>.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 2001

2000
Are structured abstracts more or less accurate than traditional ones? A study in the psychological literature.
J. Inf. Sci., 2000

1999
What do we know about footnotes? Opinions and data.
J. Inf. Sci., 1999

1998
Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in non-medical science journals?
J. Inf. Sci., 1998

The Role of Printouts in Editing Text.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 1998

1997
Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in social science journals?
Learn. Publ., 1997

A Thorn in the Flesch: Observations on the Unreliability of Computer-Based Readability Formulae.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 1997

1996
Obtaining information accurately and quickly: are structured abstracts more efficient?
J. Inf. Sci., 1996

Which layout do you prefer? An analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts.
J. Inf. Sci., 1996

1994
Designing instructional text for older readers: a literature review.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 1994

1993
Improving the readability of scientific articles.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 1993

<i>Recalling structured text: Does what goes in determine what comes out?</i>.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 1993

Writing, thinking and computers.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 1993

1991
Extracting information from flowcharts and contingency statements: the effects of age and practice.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 1991

Captions for tables and figures.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 1991

1989
The effects of sex of speaker and listener on recall from a medical audiotape.
Br. J. Educ. Technol., 1989

1988
Readability and prestige in scientific journals.
J. Inf. Sci., 1988


  Loading...