Douglas Walton

FLAP, 2021

2019

Using argumentation schemes to find motives and intentions of a rational agent.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Argument Comput., 2019

When expert opinion evidence goes wrong.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Artif. Intell. Law, 2019

2018

Representing argumentation schemes with Constraint Handling Rules (CHR).

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Horst Friedrich

Argument Comput., 2018

2017

The Slippery Slope Argument in the Ethical Debate on Genetic Engineering of Humans.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Sci. Eng. Ethics, 2017

Argumentation Schemes. History, Classifications, and Computational Applications.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

FLAP, 2017

Erratum to: Arguments from authority and expert opinion in computational argumentation systems.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Marcin Koszowy

AI Soc., 2017

Arguments from authority and expert opinion in computational argumentation systems.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Marcin Koszowy

AI Soc., 2017

2016

Towards a richer model of deliberation dialogue: Closure problem and change of circumstances.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Alice Toniolo

Timothy J. Norman

Argument Comput., 2016

Combining explanation and argumentation in dialogue.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Floris Bex

Argument Comput., 2016

An argumentation framework for contested cases of statutory interpretation.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Giovanni Sartor

Artif. Intell. Law, 2016

Formalizing Balancing Arguments.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the Computational Models of Argument, 2016

2015

A classification system for argumentation schemes.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Argument Comput., 2015

Goal-based Reasoning for Argumentation.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Cambridge University Press, ISBN: 9781107119048, 2015

2014

On a razor's edge: evaluating arguments from expert opinion.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Argument Comput., 2014

Baseballs and arguments from fairness.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Artif. Intell. Law, 2014

Interpretative Argumentation Schemes.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Giovanni Sartor

Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2014

Argumentation Schemes for Statutory Interpretation: A Logical Analysis.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2014

Burden of Proof, Presumption and Argumentation

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Cambridge University Press, ISBN: 9781107110311, 2014

2013

Distinctive features of persuasion and deliberation dialogues.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Katie Atkinson

Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon

Argument Comput., 2013

An argumentation model of forensic evidence in fine art attribution.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

AI Soc., 2013

The epistemology of scientific evidence.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Nanning Zhang

Artif. Intell. Law, 2013

Argument from analogy in legal rhetoric.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Artif. Intell. Law, 2013

2012

Using Argumentation Schemes for Argument Extraction: A Bottom-Up Method.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Int. J. Cogn. Informatics Nat. Intell., 2012

A Carneades reconstruction of Popov v Hayashi.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Artif. Intell. Law, 2012

A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Law.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Artif. Intell. Law, 2012

2011

A dialogue system specification for explanation.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Synth., 2011

Defeasible reasoning and informal fallacies.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Synth., 2011

Representing and classifying arguments on the Semantic Web.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Knowl. Eng. Rev., 2011

Reasoning about knowledge using defeasible logic.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Argument Comput., 2011

Erratum to: Computational dialectic and rhetorical invention.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

AI Soc., 2011

Computational dialectic and rhetorical invention.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

AI Soc., 2011

2010

Formalization of the ad hominem argumentation scheme.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Appl. Log., 2010

The structure of argumentation in health product messages.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Argument Comput., 2010

A dialogue model of belief.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Argument Comput., 2010

Similarity, precedent and argument from analogy.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Artif. Intell. Law, 2010

Burdens and Standards of Proof for Inference to the Best Explanation.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Floris Bex

Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2010

Types of Dialogue and Burdens of Proof.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010, 2010

Probabilistic Semantics for the Carneades Argument Model Using Bayesian Networks.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Matthias Grabmair

Proceedings of the Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010, 2010

2009

Hendrik Kaptein, Henry Prakken and Bart Verheij (eds): Review of legal evidence and proof: statistics, stories, logic.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Artif. Intell. Law, 2009

Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2009

Explanations and Arguments Based on Practical Reasoning.

[BibT_eX]

Proceedings of the Explanation-aware Computing, 2009

Burden of Proof in Deliberation Dialogs.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, 6th International Workshop, 2009

Argumentation Theory: A Very Short Introduction.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, 2009

Proof Burdens and Standards.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, 2009

2008

Can Argumentation Help AI to Understand Explanation?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Doug Walton

Künstliche Intell., 2008

The three bases for the enthymeme: A dialogical theory.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Appl. Log., 2008

A dialogical theory of presumption.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Artif. Intell. Law, 2008

Witness testimony evidence - argumentation, artificial intelligence, and law.

[BibT_eX]

Cambridge University Press, ISBN: 978-0-521-70770-1, 2008

Argumentation Schemes.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Cambridge University Press, ISBN: 9780521723749, 2008

2007

Evaluating Practical Reasoning.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Synth., 2007

Argument diagramming in logic, law and artificial intelligence.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Knowl. Eng. Rev., 2007

The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Henry Prakken

Artif. Intell., 2007

Dialogical Models of Explanation.

[BibT_eX]

Proceedings of the Explanation-Aware Computing, 2007

Dialog theory for critical argumentation.

[BibT_eX]

Controversis 5, Benjamin/Cummings, ISBN: 978-90-272-1885-8, 2007

Media argumentation - dialect, persuasion and rhetoric.

[BibT_eX]

Cambridge University Press, 2007

2006

Character Evidence, An Abductive Theory.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Argumentation Library 11, Springer, ISBN: 978-1-4020-4942-2, 2006

Epistemic and Dialectical Models of Begging the Question.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Synth., 2006

How to make and defend a proposal in a deliberation dialogue.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Artif. Intell. Law, 2006

Pierson vs. Post Revisited - A Reconstruction using the Carneades Argumentation Framework.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006, 2006

The Carneades Argumentation Framework - Using Presumptions and Exceptions to Model Critical Questions.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006, 2006

Fundamentals of critical argumentation.

[BibT_eX]

Critical reasoning and argumentation, Cambridge University Press, ISBN: 978-0-521-53020-0, 2006

2005

Argumentation Schemes and Enthymemes.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Synth., 2005

Persuasion Dialogue in Online Dispute Resolution.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

David M. Godden

Artif. Intell. Law, 2005

Towards a Formal and Implemented Model of Argumentation Schemes in Agent Communication.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Auton. Agents Multi Agent Syst., 2005

Practical Reasoning and Proposing: Tools for e-Democracy.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Proceedings of the Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, 2005

Dialogues about the burden of proof.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Henry Prakken

Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2005

Argumentation methods for artificial intelligence in law.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Daniela Vasconcelos Carbogim

Springer, ISBN: 978-3-540-25187-3, 2005

2004

Argument and Multi-Agent Systems.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Timothy J. Norman

Erik C. W. Krabbe

Proceedings of the Argumentation Machines, New Frontiers in Argument and Computation., 2004

Abductive reasoning.

[BibT_eX]

Univ. of Alabama Press, ISBN: 978-0-8173-1441-5, 2004

Argument - critical thinking, logic and the fallacies (2. ed.).

[BibT_eX]

John Hayden Woods

Andrew Irvine

Pearson Education, ISBN: 978-0-13-085115-4, 2004

2003

Is there a Burden of Questioning?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Artif. Intell. Law, 2003

Towards a Formal Account of Reasoning about Evidence: Argumentation Schemes and Generalisations.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Artif. Intell. Law, 2003

Argumentation Schemes and Generalizations in Reasoning about Evidence.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Henry Prakken

Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2003

Ethical argumentation.

[BibT_eX]

Lexington Books, ISBN: 978-0-7391-0349-4, 2003

Relevance in argumentation.

[BibT_eX]

Lawrence Erlbaum, ISBN: 978-0-8058-4760-4, 2003

2002

Legal argumentation and evidence.

[BibT_eX]

Pennsylvania State Univ. Pr., ISBN: 978-0-271-02177-5, 2002

2000

Scare Tactics, Arguments that Appeal to Fear and Threats.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Argumentation Library 3, Springer, ISBN: 978-90-481-5552-1, 2000

The Place of Dialogue Theory in Logic, Computer Science and Communication Studies.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Synth., 2000

1999

Applying Labelled Deductive Systems and Multi-Agent Systems to Source-Based Argumentation.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

J. Log. Comput., 1999

1997

How can logic best be applied to arguments?

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Log. J. IGPL, 1997

1996

Fallacies arising from ambiguity.

[BibT_eX]

Applied logic series 1, Kluwer, ISBN: 978-0-7923-4100-0, 1996

1994

Begging the question as a pragmatic fallacy.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Synth., 1994

1986

The Workstation Resource Center at Temple University.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

Susan Foster

Proceedings of the SIGUCCS '86 Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User services: setting the direction, 1986

1979

Circular demonstration and von Wright-Geach entailment.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

John Hayden Woods

Notre Dame J. Formal Log., 1979

1978

Arresting circles in formal dialogues.

[BibT_eX]

[DOI]

John Hayden Woods